Past Events
Wednesday 26 June 2019

Making the Case for Embracing Micropublications: Are they a way forward for scholarly publishing?

Please note booking has now closed for this webinar, but should you wish to be registered to receive a link to the recording after the event, please email

Date and time

Wednesday 26 June. Online.
16:00-17:00 BST, 11:00-12:00 EDT, 17:00-18:00 CEST, 08:00-09:00 PDT 

*Please note: if you are unable to join the webinar on this date and time, you may register and receive a recording for viewing at a time to suit you.

Twitter #alpspmicropublications


You may ask:

  • What’s so different about a microPublication? 
  • Why launch a microPublication?
  • Who benefits from microPublications?
  • Are microPublications changing the way researchers communicate their findings?

Join the discussion live to hear views on these questions and more. 

A primary motivation for microPublications is to facilitate the publishing of both positive and negative research findings. There is a long recognized, but not successfully addressed, loss of knowledge due to lack of regular publication of negative research findings which are just as important as positive results.    

We will hear from scientific curators with new roles as editors of microPublications, and a publisher who encourages this new publishing genre.
Read the blog

Who should attend

Publishing executives, editors, librarians, funders, researchers

Chair: Heather Staines, Head of Partnerships, MIT Knowledge Futures Group

Biography: Heather is Head of Partnerships for MIT Knowledge Futures Group, building open source infrastructure for publishers and libraries. Her previous roles include positions at Hypothesis, Proquest, SIPX (formerly the Stanford Intellectual Property Exchange), Springer SBM, and Greenwood Publishing Group/Praeger Publishers. She is a frequent speaker and participant at industry events including the COUNTER Board of Directors, the STM Futurelab, Society for Scholarly Publishing, the NISO Transfer Standing Committee, the NASIG Digital Preservation Task Force, two OPERAS working groups, and the ORCID Trust Working Group. She has a Ph.D. in Military and Diplomatic History from Yale University. Heather Staines photo


Daniela Raciti, Scientific Curator for Wormbase and Managing Editor, Micropublication Biology
Daniela is a Managing Editor for microPublication Biology and a Curator for WormBase at the California Institute of Technology. Daniela graduated from the ETH Zurich with a PhD in developmental biology. She has worked on curation of biological data for over a decade. Her expertise includes the genetics and molecular biological analysis of model organisms; literature curation and curation automation; and ontology development. With microPublication Biology she advocates for direct incorporation of peer-reviewed single experimental observations into established biological repositories.
Daniela Raciti photo
Karen Yook, Scientific Curator for Wormbase and Managing Editor, Micropublication Biology
Biography: Dr. Karen Yook is a Managing Editor for microPublication Biology and a Curator for WormBase at CalTech. Karen earned her Ph.D. in biology from the University of Utah. After Post Doctoral research, Karen became a curator at WormBase, the authoritative repository for genomic and genetic data of the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans. As a researcher and curator Karen has a unique perspective of how much research never gets into the public domain --being left out of a publication or stuck behind paywalls. With microPublication Biology she is working to get all publicly-funded data vetted and into the open.
Karen Yook photo
Abstract: A significant proportion of useful biomedical research output is not published in a timely fashion -- or ever -- because of the pressure to publish complete narratives. In addition, the effort, and hence cost, of curation at archival repositories can be inhibitory to getting these data into publicly-funded community knowledge bases. We are capturing these ‘lost’ data through both publishing the findings as micropublications in a new online journal, microPublication Biology and depositing it into archival repositories. Our platform encourages researchers to share data in a metadata-driven fashion by giving them credit for participation through a citable publication that is peer-reviewed. microPublication Biology presents a welcome alternative in scholarly communication, expanding both the nature of published data as well as engaging more members of the science community in the publication process, i.e. undergraduate students/junior graduate students as authors and senior graduate students/postdocs as reviewers. Starting with articles focused on nematode biology, microPublication Biology has expanded to other model organism communities such as Drosophila and Xenopus, giving authors the opportunity to publish experimental observations that would otherwise remain invisible to the public – stand-alone results, negative results, experimental replications and so on. When accepted after peer-review, manuscripts are published online, and atomized data is delivered directly to the authoritative database for each community (i.e., WormBase, Flybase, Xenbase), ensuring fast integration with biological knowledge bases for deep data integration and public discoverability. microPublication Biology maximizes efficiency in data curation and accessibility of research findings according to findable, accessible, interoperable, and reproducible (FAIR) data principles.  
Tracey DePellegrin, Executive Director, Genetics Society of America
Tracey is Executive Director, the Genetics Society of America (GSA), and Executive Editor of the GSA Journals GENETICS and G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics. She is formerly Editor-in-Chief of Science Editor published by the Council of Science Editors. She was a member of the NISO working group on Altmetrics and developing standards and recommended practices on data metrics, alternative outputs, and persistent identifiers for articles.
Tracey DePellegrin picture
Abstract: The landscape of scholarly publishing is rapidly changing, from the ways in which scientists share their findings to the need for the field to address issues in replication and reproducibility. In addition, venues are needed where researchers can share any type of finding - especially the 'micro' discoveries and data - rather than waiting years to tell an entire narrative. They're looking for opportunities to have their work peer-reviewed and published, rather than sit in a lab notebook. Switching to the reader perspective, the role of peer review and publication in an authoritative venue - with well-qualified reviewers and editors - is more important than ever. Peer review and an editor's careful eye lends credibility to the published data or information, serves as a quality check, and assures the readers that the data has in fact undergone scrutiny. microPublications will enhance the ways in which scientists share data and findings, in a way that serves researchers and readers alike.    

Registration and booking:

Not an ALPSP member? Want to take advantage of the reduced member rates? Click here to find out how your organization can join ALPSP

ALPSP Members: £50 + VAT per person
Non-Member: £85 + VAT per person

Members Only: Group pricing for individual webinars: If you have 4 + people wishing to attend this webinar, do get in touch to hear about our significant group discounts. Please email Susie Brown for more details.

This webinar is produced by ALPSP with support from Copyright Clearance Center.


Upcoming Dates for this event

  • Wed 26 Jun 2019
  • Wed 26 Jun 2019
  • Online, ,